|
Activities
The Department of Geography at Michigan State University has a long
tradition of excellence in GIScience. GISci-related research and teaching
at MSU focus on both theory and application of GIS technology to the
spatial analysis of a variety of physical and human phenomena. Below are
just a few examples of GISci activies we're involved with.
Click on the images for a larger view.
|
|
Ancient
Lake Algonquin. Ten thousand years ago the northern Michigan shoreline
was much different than it is today. Digital analysis of terrain survey
data employing global positioning systems (GPS) and baseline elevation
data, we can reconstruct the boundaries of this ancient lake and better
understand the region's dynamic past.
|
|
Land
Surface Change Monitoring. Dynamic terrain like dune fields can change
rapidly. This map shows the results of a process quantifying the extent of
this change between two high-resolution elevation models.
|
|
Multiresolution data models. Here a regularly gridded
dataset is partitioned into regions of variable interpolation error based
on a recursive compression algorithm. The partition can assist in
identifying areas that are difficult to model, or inform appropriate
remediation.
|
|
Fuzzy
classification models. Classification maps can include varibles that
exhibit non-discrete boundaries. Here, fuzzy set theory is used to develop
more realistic representations.
|
|
Error
Propagation via Monte Carlo simulation. A process is detailed in this
diagram to determine the effect of input spatial data error on a GIS
operation. We have investigated a variety of different components for this
process.
|
|
Characterizing spatial data error. Here, red indicates
elevations that are higher than actual, and blue indicates elevations that
are lower. We can use maps like this to model error pattern.
|
|
Modeling
spatial distribution of grain prices in West Africa. Advanced
statistical techniques can be used to identify spatial pattern. Such
patterns may inform policy and management decisions for the
region.
|
|
Alternative
global data models. The earth is not a plane. What are the
implications for using a model like this to characterize global data
sets?
|
|
Compact
Spatial Data Models. The DEM shown here consists of 4,096 different
elevations. Employing a flexible discrete cosine transform alllows us to
characterize the surface with only a few coefficients. The red contours
represent a surface with 64, 32, 16, 8, and 4 coefficients,
respectively.
|
|
Geometric Probability. The use of spatial partitions
in a data set implies that some features will intersect multiple tiles.
Here the probability of such intersections is analyzed for equilateral
triangular tiles
|
|
Choice
of raster cell resolution affects what can be observed; this is linked
in complex ways to the process scale of the mapped vector phenomenon. Here
we see the impact of different resolutions on land cover data.
Web Master: Ellen
Schueller Site Address: file:///C:/webpage/GISci/www.geo.msu.edu/gisci
©CopyRight 2001 Ellen
Schueller Department of Geography * 315 Natural Science * Michigan State University * East Lansing * MI * 48824-1115 Last Updated:
|