The Department of Geography at Michigan State University has a long
tradition of excellence in GIScience. GISci-related research and teaching
at MSU focus on both theory and application of GIS technology to the
spatial analysis of a variety of physical and human phenomena. Below
are just a few examples of GISci activities we're involved with.
Ancient
Lake Algonquin. Ten thousand years ago the northern Michigan
shoreline was much different than it is today. Digital analysis
of terrain survey data employing global positioning systems (GPS)
and baseline elevation data, we can reconstruct the boundaries
of this ancient lake and better understand the region's dynamic
past. |
Land
Surface Change Monitoring. Dynamic terrain like dune
fields can change rapidly. This map shows the results of a process
quantifying the extent of this change between two high-resolution
elevation models. |
Multiresolution
data models. Here a regularly gridded dataset is partitioned
into regions of variable interpolation error based on a recursive
compression algorithm. The partition can assist in identifying
areas that are difficult to model, or inform appropriate remediation. |
Fuzzy
classification models. Classification maps can include
variables that exhibit non-discrete boundaries. Here, fuzzy set
theory is used to develop more realistic representations. |
Error
Propagation via Monte Carlo simulation. A process is
detailed in this diagram to determine the effect of input spatial
data error on a GIS operation. We have investigated a variety
of different components for this process. |
Characterizing
spatial data error. Here, red indicates elevations that
are higher than actual, and blue indicates elevations that are
lower. We can use maps like this to model error pattern. |
Modeling
spatial distribution of grain prices in West Africa.
Advanced statistical techniques can be used to identify spatial
pattern. Such patterns may inform policy and management decisions
for the region. |
Alternative
global data models. The earth is not a plane. What are
the implications for using a model like this to characterize global
data sets? |
Compact
Spatial Data Models. The DEM shown here consists of 4,096
different elevations. Employing a flexible discrete cosine transform
allows us to characterize the surface with only a few coefficients.
The red contours represent a surface with 64, 32, 16, 8, and 4
coefficients, respectively. |
Geometric
Probability. The use of spatial partitions in a data
set implies that some features will intersect multiple tiles.
Here the probability of such intersections is analyzed for equilateral
triangular tiles. |
Choice
of raster cell resolution affects what can be observed;
this is linked in complex ways to the process scale of the mapped
vector phenomenon. Here we see the impact of different resolutions
on land cover data. |